N.Y.
Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law Section 1003
Licenses for simulcast facilities
1.
(a) Any racing association or corporation or regional off-track betting corporation, authorized to conduct pari-mutuel wagering under this chapter, desiring to display the simulcast of horse races on which pari-mutuel betting shall be permitted in the manner and subject to the conditions provided for in this article may apply to the commission for a license so to do. Applications for licenses shall be in such form as may be prescribed by the commission and shall contain such information or other material or evidence as the commission may require. No license shall be issued by the commission authorizing the simulcast transmission of thoroughbred races from a track located in Suffolk county. The fee for such licenses shall be five hundred dollars per simulcast facility and for account wagering licensees that do not operate either a simulcast facility that is open to the public within the state of New York or a licensed racetrack within the state, twenty thousand dollars per year payable by the licensee to the commission for deposit into the general fund. Except as provided in this section, the commission shall not approve any application to conduct simulcasting into individual or group residences, homes or other areas for the purposes of or in connection with pari-mutuel wagering. The commission may approve simulcasting into residences, homes or other areas to be conducted jointly by one or more regional off-track betting corporations and one or more of the following: a franchised corporation, thoroughbred racing corporation or a harness racing corporation or association; provided (i) the simulcasting consists only of those races on which pari-mutuel betting is authorized by this chapter at one or more simulcast facilities for each of the contracting off-track betting corporations which shall include wagers made in accordance with section one thousand fifteen, one thousand sixteen and one thousand seventeen of this article; provided further that the contract provisions or other simulcast arrangements for such simulcast facility shall be no less favorable than those in effect on January first, two thousand five;(ii)
that each off-track betting corporation having within its geographic boundaries such residences, homes or other areas technically capable of receiving the simulcast signal shall be a contracting party;(iii)
the distribution of revenues shall be subject to contractual agreement of the parties except that statutory payments to non-contracting parties, if any, may not be reduced; provided, however, that nothing herein to the contrary shall prevent a track from televising its races on an irregular basis primarily for promotional or marketing purposes as found by the commission. For purposes of this paragraph, the provisions of § 1013 (Binding arbitration)section one thousand thirteen of this article shall not apply. Any agreement authorizing an in-home simulcasting experiment commencing prior to May fifteenth, nineteen hundred ninety-five, may, and all its terms, be extended until June thirtieth, two thousand twenty-five; provided, however, that any party to such agreement may elect to terminate such agreement upon conveying written notice to all other parties of such agreement at least forty-five days prior to the effective date of the termination, via registered mail. Any party to an agreement receiving such notice of an intent to terminate, may request the commission to mediate between the parties new terms and conditions in a replacement agreement between the parties as will permit continuation of an in-home experiment until June thirtieth, two thousand twenty-five; and(iv)
no in-home simulcasting in the thoroughbred special betting district shall occur without the approval of the regional thoroughbred track.(b)
Any agreement authorizing in-home simulcasting pursuant to this section shall be in writing, and upon written request, a copy shall be provided to the representative horsemen’s group of the racing association or corporation that is party to said agreement. Such agreement shall include a categorical statement of new and incremental expenses directly related and attributable to the conduct of in-home simulcasting. The representative horsemen’s group may, within thirty days of receiving the agreement, petition the commission for a determination as to the appropriateness and reasonableness of any expenses attributed by either the racing association or corporation or the off-track betting corporation.2.
Before the commission may grant such license, the commission shall review and approve a plan of operation submitted by such applicant including, but not limited to the following information: a. A feasibility study denoting the revenue earnings expected from the simulcast facility and the costs expected to operate such facility. No feasibility study shall be received for a simulcast facility that is applying to renew its license. The form of the feasibility study shall be prescribed by the commission and may include:(i)
the number of simulcast races to be displayed;(ii)
the types of wagering to be offered;(iii)
the level of attendance expected and the area from which such attendance will be drawn;(iv)
the level of anticipated wagering activity;(v)
the source and amount of revenues expected from other than pari-mutuel wagering;(vi)
the cost of operating the simulcast facility and the identification of costs to be amortized and the method of amortization of such costs;(vii)
the amount and source of revenues needed for financing the simulcast facility;(viii)
the probable impact of the proposed operation on revenues to local government; b. The security measures to be employed to protect the facility, to control crowds, to safeguard the transmission of the simulcast signals and to control the transmission of wagering data to effectuate common wagering pools; c. The type of data processing, communication and transmission equipment to be utilized; d. The description of the management groups responsible for the operation of the simulcast facility; e. The system of accounts to maintain a separate record of revenues collected by the simulcast facility, the distribution of such revenues and the accounting of costs relative to the simulcast operation; f. The location of the facility and a written confirmation from appropriate local officials that the location of such facility and the number of patrons expected to occupy such facility are in compliance with all applicable local ordinances; g. The written agreements and letters of consent between specified parties pursuant to sections one thousand seven, one thousand eight and one thousand nine of this article.3.
Within forty-five days of receipt of the plan of operation provided in subdivision two of this section, the commission shall issue an order approving the plan, approving it with modifications or denying approval, in which latter case the commission shall state its reasons therefor. Within such period the commission may request additional information or suggest amendments. If the commission fails to approve the plan, the applicant may request a public hearing to be held within thirty days of the issuance of an order denying it. The commission shall issue its final determination within ten days of such hearing. The applicant may submit an amended application no sooner than thirty days after a denial.4.
No racing association, franchised corporation or corporation or regional off-track betting corporation shall be allowed to operate a simulcast facility except according to the provisions of an approved plan of operation. No change in such plan of operation may occur until an amendment proposing a change to the plan is approved by the commission. A plan of operation may be amended from time to time at the request of either the operator or the commission. The operator shall have the right to be heard concerning any amendment to the plan and the commission shall dispose of such proposed amendments as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than thirty days following submission by the operator or, in the case of amendments proposed by the commission, objection by the operator.5.
For the purpose of maintaining proper control over simulcasts conducted pursuant to this article, the commission shall license any person, association or corporation participating in simulcasting, as the commission may by rule prescribe, including, if the commission deem it necessary so to do, any or all persons, associations or corporations who create, distribute, transmit or display simulcast signals. In the case of thoroughbred racing simulcasting or harness racing simulcasting, such licenses shall be issued in accordance with and subject to the provisions governing licenses for participants and employees in article two or article three of this chapter as may be applicable to such type of racing.
Source:
Section 1003 — Licenses for simulcast facilities, https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PML/1003 (updated May 3, 2024; accessed Dec. 21, 2024).
