Public.Law logo NewYork.Public.Law
  • Laws of New York
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Laws
  3. Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering & Breeding Law
  4. Art. 6

Article 6
New York City Off-track Betting Corporation

Sections

601
Declaration of policy and statement of purposes
602
Definitions
603
New York city off-track betting corporation
604
Powers of the corporation
605
Policing of off-track betting
606
Personnel administration
607
Acquisition or leasing of property by the state or corporation
609
Contracts of corporation
609‑A
Capital acquisition fund
610
Moneys of corporation
611
Issuance of bonds and notes by corporation
612
Reserve fund
613
Agreement of the state
614
State and city not liable on bonds and notes
616
Remedies of holders of bonds and notes
617
Exemption from taxation
618
Notice of claim
619
Civil actions against employees of the corporation
620
Bonds and notes as legal investments
621
Annual and special reports
622
Separability
623
Inconsistent provisions of other laws superseded
624
Termination of the corporation
 



Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The New York State Bar Association runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Lawyer Referral Service

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location: https://newyork.public.law/laws/n.y._racing,_pari-mutuel_wagering_and_breeding_law_article_6

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Trust but verify.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.